__________ Page1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P.No.9263 of 2026 Tvl. CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORT SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED (Represented by its Managing Director Mrs. Madhavan Achuthan Nair) New No.108 Old No.963, 3rd Floor, Suit no 16 Crescent Court, PH Road, KILPAUK, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 084. ..Petitioner Vs State Tax Officer Thirukazukundram, Assessment Circle, No 42-Wahab Nagar, Thirukazhukundram – 603 109. ..Respondent PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Detailed impugned order bearing GSTIN: 33AAACC2296H1ZV/2020-21 Dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Respondent and quash the same and subsequently direct the Respondent to provide personal hearing to the petitioner by the principles of natural justice For Petitioner(s): Mr.Anand K For Respondent(s): Mrs.P.Selvi, Government Advocate. ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page2 of 7 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 29.01.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 29.01.2025. 4. It is noticed that i.e., within the period of limitation for filing an appeal against the impugned Assessment Order under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 04.03.2026. 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page3 of 7 6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- “The Petitioner is ready to deposit 25% of tax amount in the impugned order dated 29.01.2025.” 7. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case. 8. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 29.01.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 25.11.2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page4 of 7 10. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. 11. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page5 of 7 14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 13.03.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No kmm To The State Tax Officer Thirukazukundram, Assessment Circle, No 42-Wahab Nagar, Thirukazhukundram - 603 109. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page6 of 7 C.SARAVANAN, J. kmm W.P.No.9263 of 2026 13.03.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis