TUSHAR RAMCHANDRA PATIL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WP/5349/2025 · 2026-10-06
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14770 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14770 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
5-WP-5349-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5349 OF 2025 Tushar Ramchandra Patil …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents None for the Petitioner. Mr. Swapnil V. Walve, APP, a/w. Mr. Shahaji Shinde, APP, B Panel, for the Respondent-State. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED :
6th OCTOBER 2026 PC:-
1. In this Writ Petition, none appeared for the Petitioner on 17th October 2025 and 10th March 2026. On 1st October 2026, learned Counsel appeared for the Petitioner and, at his request, the matter was kept today as a last chance. Today, none appears for the Petitioner.
2. By this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 9th June 2025 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik, in Criminal Page 1 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.10.06 18:39:07 +0530
5-WP-5349-2025.DOC Miscellaneous Application No.660 of 2025. In the said application, relief sought is seeking de-freezing of the account of the Applicant. However, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, while disposing of the application has observed that the account was freezed by the Cyberabad Police Station, Telangana and therefore, the concerned Court at Telangana will have jurisdiction. Thus, no interference in the impugned order is warranted.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali