Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14768 (AP)

GANTASALA RAM PRASAD v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1025/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010015072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1025/2026 Between: GANTASALA RAM PRASAD, S/O. NARAYANA RAJU, 55 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.3-40, NEAR VINAYAKA TEMPLE, SREEPARRU VILLAGE, ELURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAVULAPALEM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533238 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANASURI ESWAR SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent against me in calling to the 2nd respondent police station and pressurizing to settle the civil dispute involved in O.S.No.20 / 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble IV Addl. District Judge at Tanuku by following unfair means as the same is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against to the principals of natural justice, and consequently direct the second respondent not to make any compulsion on the petitioner to appear before 2nd respondent police and particularly not to pressurize him to relinquish his right in the immovable property.” 2 2. Sri A.Eswar Sai, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner herein is a Defendant in the suit in O.S.No.20 of 2025 on the file of the Court of IV Additional District Judge, West Godavari at Tanuku, filed by one Adhikari Nageswara Rao for specific performance of agreement of sale. Learned counsel would further submit that the Police are calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and pressuring to settle the dispute. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home seeks time for getting instructions in this matter. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. However, it does not preclude the Police to proceed further, if any case is registered against the Petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.01.2026 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1025 of 2026 Dt.08.01.2026 Dinesh