MEGHRAJ YADAV v. CHHATTISGARH VYAVSAYIK PARIKSHA MANDAL (CG VYAPAM)
WPC/315/2026 · 2026-01-22
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14766 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14766 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:4096
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 315 of 2026 Meghraj Yadav S/o Rameswar Prasad Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o B/303 Neelyam Police Colony, District Janjgir - Champa (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal (CG Vyapam) Through Its Secretary Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Exam Controller Chhattisgarh Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal (CG Vyapam), North Block, Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board 23.01.2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ, order directing the Respondent authorities to correct the father’s name of the Petitioner from “Rameswar Yadav” to “Rameswar Prasad Yadav” in CGTET-2024 records.
10.2. That, direct the Respondents to re-issue the corrected CGTET-2024 result of the Petitioner. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.01.27 10:58:06 +0530
2 Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate petition in the light of order dated 06.5.2025 passed in WPC No.5186/2024 and Order dated 30.10.2025 passed in MCC No.1071/2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. On due consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Petition.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Bini