1 5-APEAL 390-99.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.390 OF 1999 Jagdish Tikamdas Ahuja & Ors. … Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent ----- Mr. Nitin Jagtap, appointed advocate a/w Shubham Saraf a/w Saish Sarang for the Appellants. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 06TH OCTOBER 2026 P.C. : 1. This Appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 21st June 1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.915 of 1993. 2. By the impugned judgment and order, the Learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the present Appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 436 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- each, in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for three months. 3. The report submitted by the concerned police station shows that all the three Appellants have expired during the pendency of the present Appeal. 4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) Mugdha 1 of 1 MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2026.10.06 17:48:04 +0530