IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 10762 of 2026. Decided on : 8 th July , 2026. Sher Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhinav Purohit and Ms. Ankita, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General with Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rangil Singh, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 and 3 respectively. 2. The Court stands informed that the issue raised by the petitioner herein, is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 9321 of 2025, titled Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P., decided on 06.04.2026. 3. This could not be disputed on behalf of the respondents- Department, though learned Additional Advocate General submitted that any order passed in this petition shall be subject to the right of the State 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? to assail the judgment passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra). Ordered accordingly. 4. This petition is thus disposed of with the observation that the directions passed by this Court in Vijay Parmar & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. (supra), shall mutatis mutandis be read to have been passed in this petition also. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 8th July, 2026. (jai) …2…