Bodagala Muni Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/256/2026 · 2026-01-18
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14763 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14763 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010015472026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 256/2026 Between:
1. BODAGALA MUNI KUMAR, S/O SRINIVASULUAGED 45 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO. 17-264, EAST STREET,VENKATAGIRI TOWN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
2. BODAGALA MUNI VENKATESH, S/O SRINIVASULUAGED 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 17-264, EAST STREET,VENKATAGIRI TOWN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
3. BODAGALA NAGARATHNAMMA, W/O SANKARAIAH,AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O PALAMANGALAM,CHITTOOR DISTRICT
4. BODAGALA BHASKARA RAO, S/O RAMAIAH,AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 2-6-232,NAKKALGUNTA, MIG HOUSING BOARD COLONY, WARANGAL,TELANAGANA STATE
5. BODAGALA SRINIVASULU, S/O. KRISHNAIAH,AGED 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.17-264, EAST STREET,VENKATAGIRI TOWN, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION,TIRUPATHI DISTRICTREP.
BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI
2. BODAGALA MURALI, S/OKRISHNAIAH,AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 16-62,GAJJULA STREET, VENKATAGIRI TOWN,
2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.256 of 2026 Dated 19.01.2026
TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
MOCHERLA DEEPAK BHARGAVARAM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.256 of 2026 Dated 19.01.2026
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 256/2026
ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 in C.C.No.34 of 2023 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Venkatagiri, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 452, 427 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity, ‘the IPC’).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a civil dispute pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2. The petitioners were unnecessarily implicated in false cases. Be that as it may, after thorough investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed the charge sheet, and the same is numbered as C.C.No.34 of 2023 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Venkatagiri. The case is coming up for appearance of the accused. Whether there are civil disputes or not is a matter for trial. Whether the petitioners have caused mischief or trespass is also a subject matter of trial.
4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.256 of 2026 Dated 19.01.2026
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Criminal Petition is
disposed of dispensing with the presence of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 3, 4, 5, and 9, except at important stages of the trial where their presence is required.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 19.01.2026 PRA
5 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.256 of 2026 Dated 19.01.2026
30 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.256 of 2026
Date: 19.01.2026
PRA