2026:JHHC:8691 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 842 of 2022 Anil Singh, aged about 56 years, son of Sri K.P. Singh resident of Thakurbari Road, Near Sales Tax Colony, P.O. and P.S. Sakchi, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum State Jharkhand … … Opposite Party No.1/Respondent No.1/Petitioner Versus 1. Nimai Ghosh, Son of Late Jogendra Mohan Ghosh resident of Holding No.158, New Planning Area, Dhalbhum Road, P.S. Sakchi, PO-Sakchi Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. … Appellant/Petitioner/Defendant/Opposite Panty No.1. 2. Kundan Verma Son of D.S. Verma resident of Holding No.159, Dhalbhum Road, SNP Area, Sakchi, P.O-Sakchi P.S. Sakchi, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum State Jharkhand 3. Ms. Namita Ghosh Daughter of Late Jogendra Mohan Ghosh resident of Holding No.158, Sakchi, New Planning Area, Dhalbhum Road, P.O.- Sakchi P.S. Sakchi, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum State Jharkhand. 4. Sabita Ghosh, daughter of late Jogendra Mohan Ghosh, wife of Pratik Ranjan Day, resident of Flat No.4/2, Gajendra Apartment, Dumuhani Road, Sonari, P.O. & P.S. Sonari, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, permanent resident of Holding No.158, Sakchi New Planning Area, Dhalbhum Road, P.O. & P.S. – Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum … … Defendant/Appellant/Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Parambir Singh Bajaj, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : --- 16/26.03.2026 This petition has been filed seeking a direction to release cost of Rs.1,50,000/- in favour of the petitioner which was directed to be paid in favour of the petitioner by opposite party no.1 namely Nimai Ghosh vide order dated 02.05.2019 passed by this Court while allowing CMP No.298 of 2018 with I.A. No.7157 of 2018 seeking condonation of delay for restoration of the First Appeal No.51 of 1999 (R). 2. The learned counsel submits that the cost was paid through demand draft, but it expired and by the intervention of this Court, the demand draft has now been revalidated and it is now dated 02.02.2026 and is placed on record. 2026:JHHC:8691 2 3. Since the revalidated demand draft has been placed on record, office is directed to handover the demand draft to the Advocate on record, who undertakes to hand it over to the petitioner. 4. This CMP is accordingly disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav/- Uploaded on 30.03.2026