APHC010015062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 90/2025 Between: 1. SMT CH. SIVAKUMARI,, D/O SURYANARAYANA OCC-SCHOOL ASSISTANT (ENGLISH), AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PRESENTLY UDER PRAKASAM DISTRCIT DEO POOL, R/O, FLAT NO 105, MARUTI ENCLAVE, OPP- H.P PETROL BUNK, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI A KIRAN KUMAR, MA Msc- Med. The District Educational Officer, Ground Floor.Prakasam Bhavan, Prakasam District. Ongole. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and punish the Contemnor/ respondents herein for their willful, deliberate Disobedience for non- implementation of Judgment of this Honble court in W.P No 30623 of 2024 dated 24.12.2024 under section 10 to 12 of contempt of court act 1971 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with in filing he certified copy of judgement in WP 30623 of 2024 dated 24.12.2024 and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD p. 2 SRS,J Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 24.12.2024 passed in W.P.No.30623 of 2024. 2. Sri Rama Chandra Rao Gurram, learned counsel for the respondent, would submit that the respondent has complied with the order passed by this Court. He would further submit that pursuant to the order dated 24.12.2024, the petitioner was deputed to work in Vetapalem ZPHS, by proceedings Rc.No.7435/A7/2024 dated 20.02.2025. The petitioner joined ZPHS, Vetapalem, Vetapalem Mandal on 28.02.2025 and worked there till the end of the academic year 2024-2025. He would submit that after completion of the academic year, the petitioner was relieved on 22.04.2025 and presently, she is working in ZPHS, Vemulakota, Markapuram Mandal. He would submit that if the petitioner makes any application seeking deputation to Vetapalem ZPHS, the respondent will consider the same in accordance with the Rules. 3. Thus, as seen from the material available on record and given the above submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court opines that the respondent has not violated the order dated 24.12.2024 passed in the writ petition. 4. Given the above, the contempt case is dismissed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from making an application to the respondent seeking deputation to Vetapalem. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.01.2026 IKN p. 3 SRS,J 190 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 90 of 2025 Date : 22.01.2026 IKN