APHC010014202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 34/2026 Between: 1. PARTHIPATISREENIVASA RAO ALIAS SRINU, S/O RANGAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, RAJAKABY CASTE, R/O PANDILLAPALLI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 20-11- 2025 passed in CrI.M.P.No.765 of 2025 in L.P.C.No. 2 of2018 on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum- I Additional Judicial Magistrate of Chirala and consequently "allow the petition filed under Section 70(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by recalling the LBW issued against the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the .further proceedings. in L.P.C.No. 2 of 2018on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of Chirala and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 34/2026 ORDER: The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 438 and 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the Order dated 20.11.2025, passed by the learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, in Crl.M.P.No.767 of 2025 in L.P.C.No.2 of 2018. 2. Heard Sri A.Radhakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is Accused No.5 in C.C.No.271 of 2017, against whom, the case is split up and numbered as L.P.C.No.2 of 2018 on the file of the learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala. The petitioner herein filed a petition to recall the Non-bailable Warrant against him, which was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit the Court may impose any condition to secure the presence of the petitioner before the Court for Trial. In fact, against the remaining accused in C.C.No.271 of 2017, though the case was ended in acquittal, they preferred an appeal, wherein the accused were imposed a fine of Rs.1,000/-. 4 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. As can be seen from the record, the petitioner is facing allegations for the offence punishable under Sections 324 and 427 r/w 34 of IPC. 6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. However, the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judge and execute a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two (2) sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge, to assure his presence before the Court. Learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose of the matter in L.P.C.No.2 of 2018, as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.01.2026. UPS 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 34/2026 Dt.19.01.2026 UPS