Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14750 (ALL)

FIROZ v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/35511/2026 · 2026-10-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35511 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice to the informant has been served on 30.9.2026. 2. Heard Sri Anand Mani Pandey, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Vipul Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 556 of 2026, under Section 74 BNS and 9M/10 POCSO Act, Police Station Lisari Gate, District Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the victim in her statement recorded u/s 183 BNSS has not made any allegations against the applicant and that she has also not identified the applicant, as there is no test identification parade conducted as per Section 7 of the B.S.A.; that the applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Firoz, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any of the above condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observation herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 6, 2026 Shalini Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vipul Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Firoz .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad