Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1475 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. BRIGADIER MAHARAJA SAWAI BHAWANI SINGH

SAC/4/2025 · 2026-04-02

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Shubha Mehta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13722-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Civil) No. 4/2025 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary To The Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus 1. Brigadier Maharaja Sawai Bhawani Singh, S/o Late Shri Maharaja Sawai Mansingh Bahadur, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of City Palace, Jaipur ( Died During The Pendency Of The Suit). 1/1. H.s. Maharaja Sawai Padmanabh Singh S/o Late Shri Maharaja Sawai Bhawani Singh Ji, Aged About 13 Years, Through Natural Guardian Mother Rajamata Padmini Devi , Resident Of City Palace , Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Thakur Narain Singh S/o Late Shri Thakur Man Singh, Resident Of Siras House, Gangapole , Jaipur. 1/2. H.s. Rajmata Padmini Devi W/o Late Shri Maharaja Sawai Bhawani Singh, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of City Palace, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Thakur Narain Singh S/o Late Shri Thakur Man Singh, Resident Of Siras House, Gangapole, Jaipur. 1/3. Princes Diya Kumari D/o Late Shri Maharaja Sawai Bhawani Singh W/o Maharaj Naredra Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of City Palace, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Thakur Narain Singh S/o Late Shri Thakur Man Singh, Resident Of Siras House, Gangapole, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma with Ms. Prisha Singh Sisodia HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order [2026:RJ-JP:13722-DB] (2 of 2) [SAC-4/2025] 02/04/2026 1. The notices were issued in this case to the respondents who were represented by their counsels before the Single Bench because of the reasons that the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed to hear the appeal itself. Since the first appeal was ordinarily heard by Single Bench and the original First Appeal filed by the State was dismissed in default and this Court had upheld the order of dismissal which has been set aside by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and restored the appeal to its original file, we direct the parties to be present before the Single Bench which is hearing the First Appeals. 2. The First Appeal is restored to its original number. Registry shall place the First Appeal before the Single Bench having the roster. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ RAHUL MIRKHANI/1