Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9329 WP No. 1802 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1802 OF 2026 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN:
SRI K S NARAYANASWAMI S/O SRI RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 47Y EARS R/AT NO.41 KANIVENARAYANAPURA MUDDENAHALLI CHIKKABALLAPURA -562101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ KRAPAKAR HEGDE., ADV.) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVE M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE COOPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY, 3RD FLOOR, SHANTINAGAR TTMC 'A' BLOCK, K.H.ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY IT'S COMMISSIONER
3.
THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER CHIKKABALLAPURA AND KOLAR DISTRICT AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9329 WP No. 1802 of 2026
KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101
4.
THE RETURNING OFFICER, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT COOPEARATIVE MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETY'S UNION LTD, HUTHURU POST, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101
5.
THE CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT COOPEARATIVE MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETY'S UNION LTD, HUTHURU POST, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101 REPRESENTED BY IT'S CEO
6.
KANIVENARAYANAPURA MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, KANIVENARAYANAPURA, MUDDENAHALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA 562 101.
REPRESENTED BY IT'S CEO. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4, SRI. A DEVARAJA, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE FINAL INELIGIBLE VOTERS LIST ISSUED BY R3 DATED 14.01.2026 (VIDE ANNX-F) IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9329 WP No. 1802 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the election was concluded and in view of the same, nothings survives for consideration in this writ petition.
2. The submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB