Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14747 (CHH)

AARTI KESHERWANI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13102/2025 · 2026-01-18

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3146 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13102 of 2025 1 - Aarti Kesherwani D/o Mr. Dwarika Kesherwani Aged About 38 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, Piparkunda, Block Podi Uproda, District Korba C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil Distric Raipur C.G. 2 - Director Directorate Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - District Education Officer Korba, District Korba C.G. 4 - Block Education Officer, Block Podi Uproda, District Korba C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.S. Rajput, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 19/0 1/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/directing the respondent authorities to grant promotion to the petitioner on the post of headmaster (Primary School) w.e.f. 03.05.2023. 10.2 Any other relief/reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the grievance of the petitioner could be redressed if direction is issued to the Respondent No. 3 to take decision on the pending representation dated 29.10.2025 (Annexure P/6) at the earliest within specified time. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the respondents, to take decision on the representation, he is having no objection in view of the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. If the representation is pending consideration, it will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 3 to consider and take decision on the pending representation dated 29.10.2025 (Annexure P/6) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 02 months from the date of receipt of the order. 6. However, petitioner will be at liberty to enclose copy of this order before the concerned authority for consideration of the grounds as raised by the petitioner in this writ petition. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.27 12:06:04 +0530