Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14743 (JHR)

POONAM KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/500/2025 · 2026-05-05

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13783 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 500 of 2025 …… Poonam Kumari, aged about 36 years, wife of Sri Krishan Kumar, resident of Baheri, P.O. Oraiya, P.S. Mufassil, District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Sunil Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Kumud Sahay, wife / daughter of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Commissioner cum-District Programme Coordinator, Jamtara, P.O. and P.S. Jamtara, District Jamtara, Jharkhand. 4. Mr. Niranjan Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Development Commissioner, Jamtara, P.O. and P.S. Jamtara, District Jamtara, Jharkhand. 5. Mr. Niranjan Kumar son of not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Additional District Programme Coordinator Jamtara, District Rural Development, P.O. and P.S. Jamtara, District-Jamtara, Jharkhand. …..Opposite Party (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.C.Mishra, Adv For the Opp.-State : Mr. Divyam, A.C. to S.C.-IV …… 05/05.05.2026 Having regard to the passing of the reasoned order coupled with the directions therein, this Court is of the view that no case of contempt is made out. However, learned counsel for the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same, if so advised. (Deepak Roshan, J) 05.05.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 26.05.2026