Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14743 (CAL)

SUSMITA NANDA BERA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/16618/2025 · 2026-03-19

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

142. 142. (ML) (ML) 19.03.2026 19.03.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 16618 OF 2025 MRS. SUSMITA NANDA BERA VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Mr. Ajay Chaubey, Adv. Mrs. Sabnam Laskar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Swati Jha, Adv. …for the U.O.I. Mr. Jayanta Samanta, Jr. G.A. Mr. Sambuddha Dutta, Adv. …for the State 1. At the time of call no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. 2. However, Union of India and State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. Same situation prevailed on 31st July, 2025 before the Co-ordinate Bench. 4. It appears petitioner has lost interest in the matter. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed for default. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)