IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.723 of 2026 Decided on: 08.07.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Rajinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Amit Kashyap and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. S.S. Panta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the respondents submits that compliance affidavit has been filed in the Registry of this Court. A copy whereof was made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, case of the petitioner was considered and rejected under order dated 30.06.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of respondent’s having considered the case of the petitioner, the judgment in question now stands 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - implemented, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to assail the decision of the respondents in accordance with law. 3. Taking note of compliance affidavit as also the submissions made for the parties, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Petitioner, shall, however, be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of its surviving grievances, if any, including against the consideration order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 08, 2026 R.Atal