RAJENDER KUMAR v. SHRI MOHAMMED SHAYIN , IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/243/2026 · 2026-03-25
Sudeepti Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14734 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14734 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-243-2026 --
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 227 COCP-243-2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 RAJENDER KUMAR
......Petitioner Vs.
MOHD. SHAYIN, IAS AND OTHERS .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J. (Oral)
1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 10.09.2024 passed in CWP-14101- 2004, whereby, a direction was issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for respondents contends that in compliance of
order dated 10.09.2024, speaking order dated 19.03.2026 has been passed. The same is taken on the record and a copy thereof has been supplied to
learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. A perusal of speaking order dated 19.03.2026 shows that order dated 10.09.2024 passed in CWP-14101-2004 has been complied with.
4. In view of the same, the contempt is purged and rule is discharged.
5. Needless to say that liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to challenge the speaking order dated 19.03.2026 in accordance with law.
POONAM RANI 2026.03.27 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-243-2026 --
6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of. 25.03.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) P. Seth
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.03.27 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document