Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14731 (JHR)

AMAR XALXO v. CHAIRMAN, JHARKHAND COMBINED E

WPC/6358/2011 · 2026-01-29

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2364 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6358 of 2011 ---------- Amar Xalxo, son of Tone Xalxo, resident of village Dibdih, P.O. Argora, P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman, Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, having its office at Engineers Hostel, Section-III, H.E.C. Campus, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Hatia, District Ranchi. 2. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Labour, Employment and Training Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. Joint Director, Training, Labour, Employment and Training Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 4. Deputy Director, Labour, Employment and Training Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 5. Director, Employment and Training, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. ………. Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Binit Chandra, AC to AAG-III ---------- 05/ 29.01.2026 None appears for the petitioner. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred for a direction upon the respondent No.2 to immediately and forthwith issue appointment letter in favour of the petitioner as he appeared and qualified in the counselling which was held on 08.12.2010. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issue involved in this writ application is with regard to appointment pursuant to Advertisement of the year 2009 and entire selection process is over and perhaps this might be the reason that petitioner is not interest in this case. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid fact that the case relates to appointment pursuant to Advertisement of the year 2009 and by 2026:JHHC:2364 2 efflux of time the entire selection process is over and further, the petitioner is also not pursuing the writ application; accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 29th January, 2026 Kunal/- Uploaded on 03/02/2026