HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40939 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Sanjeet Kumar Dubey, learned counsel representing Kanpur Development Authority are present. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his complaint/representation dated 24.08.2026 has not been redressed and such situation impelled the petitioner to invoke the writ jurisdiction. 3. Under the circumstances, without going into the merit of the case, we deem it appropriate to issue a direction to respondent no. 2 - Kanpur Development Authority to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.08.2026 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order strictly in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C., Sanjeet Kumar Dubey (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ramesh Chandra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad