APPARAO BALWANT SABALE DIED THR LRS GOVERDHAN APPARAO SABALE v. The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad
CA/2407/2026 · 2026-07-02
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
917 to 920 withdrawal.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2406 OF 2026 IN FA/458/2025 Abhiman Manik Gaikwad VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S.H. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Chetan T. Jadhav ... 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2407 OF 2026 IN FAST/32441/2024 Apparao Balwant Sabale Died Thr Lrs Goverdhan Apparao Sabale VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Snehal P. Kulkarni ... 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2423 OF 2026 IN FAST/32433/2024 Surendra Ambadas Narsale VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. P.V. Diggikar Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Snehal P. Kulkarni ... 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2434 OF 2026 IN FA/2621/2025 Shivaji Bhagwan Sutar Jagtap VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad ... 2026:BHC-AUG:25628
917 to 920 withdrawal.odt (2) Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. R.R. Tandale Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Vaishali S. Swami h/f Mr. Mahesh Swami ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : JULY 02, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The applicants seek permission to withdraw amount deposited by acquiring body in pursuance to award passed by Reference Court. 2. Learned advocate appearing for applicants submits that in sister appeals, applicants are permitted to withdraw 75% of amount deposited by Reference Court on furnishing undertaking and balance 25% is permitted to be withdrawn on furnishing solvent surety/security to satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. He would urge to adopt same course in present case. Reliance is placed on order dated 23.12.2025 passed in Civil Application No.5298 of 2025 in case of Jalindhar Bapu Padulkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and order dated 25.06.2026 passed in Civil Application No.2422 of 2026 in case of Vasudeo Mahadeo Miskin Versus The State Of Maharashtra. 3.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of acquiring body on verification of order accepts that orders relied by applicants are pertaining to same acquisition arising out of same notification. 917 to 920 withdrawal.odt (3)
4. In that view of matter, this Court deems it appropriate to follow same course. Hence, civil applications are allowed. The applicants are permitted to withdraw 75% of amount deposited with accrued interest on furnishing usual undertaking to satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. In addition, applicants are also permitted to withdraw 25% of amount deposited with accrued interest on furnishing solvent surety/security to satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 5. Civil Applications stand disposed of. (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//