Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14723 (CAL)

SALMA SULTANA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/7956/2025 · 2026-02-16

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28 16.02. 2026 Ct. No. 24 Ab WPA 7956 of 2025 Salma Sultana Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Asish Kumar Guha, Mr. Rajendra Chaturvedi. … for the State. Mr. Tapas Kumar Dey. … for the respondent no. 2. Mr. D. N. Maiti, Mr. A. Santra. … for the respondent nos. 3-4. Mr. Abir Sarkar. … for the respondent no. 5. Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee. … for the INC. 1. As on several earlier occasions, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner nor is any accommodation prayed for. 2. The writ petition is dismissed for default. 3. Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated. 4. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) 2