Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1472 (ORI)

RAHUL JAIN v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMP/108/2026 · 2026-02-12

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 108 of 2026 Rahul Jain …. Petitioner Mr. Mihir Sahoo, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar-Cuttack, Bhubaneswar 3. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cuttack 4. Inspector-in-Charge, Airfield Police Station, Bhubaneswar …. Opposite Parties Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 12.02.2026 01. (Through hybrid mode) 1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to the Opposite Party No.4 to complete the investigation in Airfield P.S. Case No.241 dated 18.09.2023. 2. Heard Mr. Mihir Sahoo, learned counsel for the Petitioner and perused the averments in the CRLMP. 3. It has been alleged that the accused had assured to give a shop room to the Petitioner, for which he had taken payment of p. 2 ₹6,40,000/- but the shop room has not been given to the Petitioner. Although the Petitioner had informed the Airfield Police Station but, as they did not register the FIR, he had filed 1CC Case No.3998 of 2023 in the Court of learned JMFC, Bhubaneswar, who had been pleased to direct the Opposite Party No.4 to register the FIR and accordingly, FIR has been registered. In the meanwhile, more than two and half years have elapsed but investigation has not been completed. 4. Since the Petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy if he is aggrieved by the pace of the investigation, I am not inclined to entertain this CRLMP and issue any direction to the Opposite Party No.4. 5. The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge RKS