Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1472 (JHR)

DINESH GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH HOME SECRETARY

W.P.(Cr.)/978/2024 · 2026-03-09

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr) No. 978 of 2024 ----- Dinesh Gope, S/o Sri Kameshwar Gope, R/o Lapa, Mohratoli, P.O.-Lapa, P.S.-Khunti, Dist.-Khunti … …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Home Secretary 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, Kutchery Chowk, Deputy Pare Ahirtoli, P.O. & P.S.-Morabadi, Ranchi 3. Jail Superintendent Birsa Munda Central Jail, Hotwar, P.O. & P.S.-Hotwar, Dist.-Ranchi 4. Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Maidini Nagar Dist.-Palamau … …. Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA-III ----- Oral Order 11 / Dated : 09.03.2026 1. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein that the petitioner was admitted at AIIMS, New Delhi in OPD Ortho on 05.03.2026 and was advised to consult after three months. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition was that he was suffering from Non-Union with implant failure endangering radial nerve damage and despite the fact that he was referred for treatment to higher center, he was not sent there for treatment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the factual assertion made on behalf of the State that the petitioner’s treatment has commenced at Delhi. 4. Under the circumstance, since the grievance of the petitioner has been satisfied, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending, I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satayendra Uploaded on 11.03.2026