Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14719 (GAU)

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. DIPAMANI MAJUMDAR AND 3 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3326/2026 · 2026-09-17

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010190202026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3326/2026 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PLOT NO. CBD-81, NEW TOWN, KOLKATA-700156 AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT G. S. ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-5, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF REGIONAL MAN VERSUS DIPAMANI MAJUMDAR AND 3 ORS. W/O HEMAKANTA MAJUMDAR, 2:HEMAKANTA MAJUMDAR S/O LATE PADRAM MAJUMDAR BOTH ARE PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SINGIA PANIGAON P.S. SAMAGURI DISTRICT-NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782140. 3:RIYAJUL HOQUE S/O HABIBUR RAHMAN VILLAGE KOCHAGAON P.O. SAIDARIA P.S. RUPAHIHAT DISTRICT-NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782125. 5:MD FAKHRUL ISLAM Page No.# 2/3 S/O MD. T. ISLAM VILLAGE DALBARI P.O. SOLMARI P.S. MORIGAON DISTRICT-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. S ROY, MS DHRITI HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR ADITYA AGARWALA, FOR CAVEATOR,MR. A R AGARWALA BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 18.09 . 2026 Heard Ms. D. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A. Agarwala, learned counsel for the Caveator/respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Act, has been preferred praying for condonation of delay of 31 days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the learned Member, MACT, No.1, Kamrup (M), Guwahati, in MAC Case No. 976/2018. 3. This Court has gone through the pleadings and is of the view that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay of 31 days in filing the appropriate in MAC appeal. 4. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay of 31 days is condoned. Page No.# 3/3 5. The Registry is directed to register the main MAC appeal and thereafter list the same for admission a week. The Registry shall also reflect the name of Mr. A. Agarwala counsel for the respondent No. 1 and 2. 6. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant