APHC010011532019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 518/2019 Between: 1. VARIKUTI VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O. CHINNA VENKATA REDDY, BUSINESS, VISWANADHAPURAM, PODILI TOWN AND MANDAL. PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, GOVT OF A.P. GUNTUR.A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ Order or orders, Direction or Direction to declare the proceecdings of 2nd Respondent in Draft memo No G2/19134/2011 dt.01-12-2011 as illegal, without jurisdiction and Unconstitutional and to issue consequential direction to the 4th respondent to receive and register the document that may be presented by the petitioner for an admeasuring of 39 1/2 x 25 Sq. yards (East- west 9 1/2 feets and North- South 25 feets) of House No. 11-465-59 in the sy. No.190/2, 2 situated at podili vilage and Mandar, Markapuram Revenue Division, Prakasam Dist without reference to the memo of the 2rd respondent bearing No. G2/19134/2011 dt.01-12-2011 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to receive and register the document that may be presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of the property for an admeasuring of 39 1/2 X 25 Sq. yards (East- west 9 1/2 feets and North- South 25 feets) of House No. 11-465-59 in the Sy.No.190/2, situated at Podili village & Mandal, Markapuram Revenue Division, Prakasam Dist without reference to the memo of the 2nd respondent bearing No. G2/19134/2011 dt.01 -12-2011 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri K. Giridhar, learned counsel, representing Sri Venkateswarlu Gada, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.03.2026 KAS 4 118 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 518/2019 Dated: 05.03.2026 KAS