Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14716 (AP)

JAGARLAMUDI VASANTHA RAO v. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE

WP/1551/2026 · 2026-01-28

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010011692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.1551 OF 2026 Between: Jagarlamudi Vasantha Rao ...PETITIONER AND Regional Passport Office, Vijayawada, rep. by the Regional Passport Officer and others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondents: 1. GP FOR HOME 2. ALEKHYA TADASINA(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition has been filed questioning the action of 1st respondent in not considering the petitioner’s application, vide File No. VJE065878512725 dated 06.11.2025, and in not issuing a passport to him. SRK, J WP No.1551 of 2026 2 2. Case of the petitioner is that, he made an online application before 1st respondent, bearing File No.VJE065878512725, dated 06.11.2025, for issuance of Passport. While so, on 15.12.2025, 1st respondent issued a show cause notice to the petitioner stating that Police Verification Report indicates that he was involved in a criminal case registered in Crime No.128 of 2023 of Addanki Police Station, Bapatla district, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 386 read with 34 IPC. Petitioner states that 1st respondent is not issuing passport on the ground of pendency of investigation in the said Crime. Hence, he filed the present Writ Petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that the case in Crime No.128 of 2023 of Addanki Police Station, Bapatla district is at the stage of investigation. 4. The issue and renewal of passports is regulated by the Passports Act, 1967. Section 6(2), extracted below, is relevant for this purpose. (2) subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds, and on no other ground, namely:- (a) that the applicant is not a citizen of India., (b) that the applicant may, or is likely to, engage outside India in activities prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India., (c) that the departure of the applicant from India may, or is likely to, be detrimental to the security of India., SRK, J WP No.1551 of 2026 3 (d) that the presence of the applicant outside India may, or is likely to, prejudice the friendly relations of India with any foreign country., (e) that the applicant has, at any time during the period of five years immediately preceding the date of his application, been convicted by a Court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years., (f) that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a criminal court of India., (g) that a warrant or summons for the appearance, or a warrant for the arrest, of the applicant has been issued by a Court under any law for the time being in force or that an order prohibiting the departure from India of the applicant has been made by any such court., (h) that the applicant has been repatriated and has not reimbursed the expenditure incurred in connection with such repatriation., (i) that in the opinion of the Central Government the issue of a passport or travel document to the applicant will not be in the public interest. The grounds on which, the issue of Passport to the petitioner is being refused could at best fall within the ambit of Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act,1967. This provision has been considered in various cases and the ambit of this provision is fairly settled. 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its Judgment dated 27.09.2021 in Crl.A.No.1342 of 2017 in the case of Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, after considering Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, held that SRK, J WP No.1551 of 2026 4 the passport authority cannot refuse renewal of the passport on the ground of pendency of a criminal case and directed the passport authority to renew the passport. 6. A learned Single Judge of the High Court at Madras in the order dated 04.02.2021 in W.P.No.20058 of 2020 held that mere pendency of a First Information Report cannot be the legal basis for denial of issuance of a regular passport to the petitioner and that it is only after cognizance is taken by an appropriate Court that it can be held that criminal proceedings have commenced and issuance or renewal of the passport would be depended on no objection being given by the concerned Court. 7. The Central Government has also issued GSR No.570(E), dated 25.08.1993 stipulating that a no objection order would be required from a Court only if it falls within the ambit of Section 6(2)(f). 8. In view of the fact that Section 6(2)(f) of the Act, 1967, would arise only when there is a pending proceeding before the Criminal Court after cognizance is taken, it would have to be held that as of now there is no pending criminal proceeding before the Court. 9. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to 1st respondent to consider the application of the petitioner for issue of Passport, without raising any objection relating to the pendency of Crime No.128 of 2023 of Addanki Police Station, Bapatla district. It is further observed that if the petitioner intends SRK, J WP No.1551 of 2026 5 to travel abroad, it is needless to mention that he has to resort in filing an application before appropriate Court seeking No- objection Certificate (NOC). 10. However, this order shall not preclude 3rd respondent- Station House Officer, Addanki Police Station, Bapatla district from taking such steps as are necessary to ensure the presence of the petitioner, for conduct of the investigation of the aforesaid crime for any other purposes. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:29.01.2026 Nsr SRK, J WP No.1551 of 2026 6 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.1551 of 2026 Date:29.01.2026 Nsr