Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23516 RSA No. 1121 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1121 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1. M.B. KRISHNAPPA S/O. BASAVANYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/O. NEHRU NAGAR ANAVATTI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 2. SHANTAMMA W/O. GANAPATHI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O. NEHARU NAGAR ANAVATTI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M. RAMAMURTHY S/O. LATE NARASIMHACHAR MADDI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTARIST R/O. D/NO.127, FIRST CROSS CENTRAL EXCISE LAYOUT VIJANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040. 2. M. KRSIHNA MURTHY S/O. LATE NARASIMHACHAR MADDI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT D.NO.31, 12TH BLOCK WATER TANK ROAD, MADHUVANA 2ND STAGE, SRIRAMPURAM
Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23516 RSA No. 1121 of 2025
MYSORE - 560 040. 3. M. SUDHINDHRA S/O. OF LATE NARASIMHAACHAR MADDI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/O. NO 254, SUBHADRA SADHANA UPSTAIRS, 2ND CROSS BASAVANGUDI, SHIVAMOGGA - 560 004. 4. M. SRINATH S/O. LATE NARASIMACHAR MADDI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O. CHAMARAJA EXTENSION ANVATTI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA - 577 413. 5. M. ANIL S/O. LATE NARASIMHACHAR MADDI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O. AC-4, MGM APARTMENTS ABBAIH NAIDU STUDIO CHIKKALSANDRA BENGALURU - 560 061. 6. M. ANITHA W/O. RAJU GAJENDRAGHAD AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O. AC-4, MGM APARTMENTS ABBAIH NAIDU STUDIO CHIKKALSANDRA BENGALURU - 560 061. 7. YATANALLI BASAVANYAPPA S/O. RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O. ANAVATTI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 560 004. 8. SHANTHAMMA W/O. ISHWARAPPA E.T.
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23516 RSA No. 1121 of 2025
R/O. ANAVATTI VILLAGE ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 560 004. 9. DEVARAJ S/O. ISHWARPPA E.T.
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O. ANAVATTI VILLAGE ANAVATTI HOBI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 560 004. 10. SREENIVASA S/O. ISHWARAPPA E.T.
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O. ANAVATTI VILLAGE ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 11. ARAVIND S/O. ISHWARAPPA E. T.
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O. ANAVATTI VILLAGE ANAVATTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 12. MOOKAPPA S/O. HONAPPA OLEKAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O. HIREANAJI, BYADAGI TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT - 581 106. 13.
SHAILA @ SHAILAMMA W/O. M.B. KRSIHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O. CHAMARAJA BADAVANE ANAVATTI, SORABHA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 14. DARSHAN S/O. M.B. KRISHANPPA. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23516 RSA No. 1121 of 2025
R/O. CHAMARAJA BADAVANE ANAVATTI, SORABHA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 15. PAVAN S/O. M.B. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O. CHAMARAJA BADAVANE ANAVATTI, SORABHA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 16. T. H. BASAVARAJAPPA S/O. PRBHANNA SHYANUBHOG AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/O TALLUU VILLAGE ANAVATTI HOBLI SORABHA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 17. K. NAGARAJAPPA S/O. PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS R/O. KATUVALLI VILLAGE ANAVTTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 18. UMESH U.C.
S/O. CHANDRASHEKARAPPA UDUGANI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O. CHAMARAJA BADAVANE ANAVATTI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. 19. A.C. MADHURAO S/O A. CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O. CHAMARAJ BADAVANE ANAVATTI SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 413. …RESPONDENTS
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23516 RSA No. 1121 of 2025
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2025 PASSED IN R.A.NO.10004/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.04.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.21/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SORABA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants is present.
2. The objections raised by Registry has not been rectified, despite the matter having been listed for the sixth time. Therefore, this Court finds no justification to grant any further adjournment.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN\List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30