2026:JHHC:3883 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10390 of 2025 ------ Rajendra Oraon, aged about 19 years, S/o Birsa Oraon, R/o Village- Tetartoli, P.O.- Patratu, P.S.- Chanho, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 10391 of 2025 Rajesh Oraon, aged about 22 years, S/o Birsa Oraon, R/o Village- Tetartoli, P.O.- Patratu, P.S.- Chanho, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. ------ Order No. 03 / Dated : 12.02.2026 B.A. No. 10390 of 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant bail petition. Permission is accorded. Bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn. B.A. No. 10391 of 2025 Bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner-Rajesh Oraon, who is in custody since 27.04.2025 in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 127(2), 309(6), 64(1) 308(3), 308(4) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C.-XXII, Ranchi is pressed into motion. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner, as per the prosecution case disclosed in the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, this petitioner was not involved in the offence. Only role that has been attributed to him is that after the incidence he brought his brother-Rajendra Oraon, who is co-accused in this case from the place of occurrence. Save and except the use of the motorcycle in the crime, there is no other material against him and he has also no criminal antecedent. 2026:JHHC:3883 Recovery of the looted articles was made from the co-accused, not from this petitioner. Learned A.P.P. opposed the bail petition. It is submitted that the co-accused of this case was identified in TIP. Matter involves dacoity and rape in which motorcycle of this petitioner was used. Under the circumstance, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Simran/ Uploaded on:13.02.2026