( 2026:HHC:27506 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.386 of 2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Shyam Lal ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated nil along with Office Order dated 06.07.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.13135/2025, titled as Shyam Lal vs. State of H.P. & Ors., the fresh representation of the petitioner has been decided by the Deputy Director of School Education, Sirmaur, vide order dated 06.07.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:27506 ) is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 06.07.2026, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 08, 2026 (reena)