903-FA-424-2011.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2011 The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Divn No. 2 Latur VERSUS Pandurang Venkoba Tekale And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 423 OF 2011 The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Divn No. 2 Latur VERSUS Janardhan Tukaram Gadime U/g Of Nat.father Tukaram Govinda Gadime And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2011 The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Divn No. 2 Latur VERSUS Venkat Hanmant Tekale And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 403 OF 2011 The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Divn No. 2 Latur VERSUS Ramling Bhimrao Patil And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 402 OF 2011 The Executive Engineer Lower Terna Canal Divn No. 2 Latur VERSUS Subhash Dnyanoba Patil And Anr ... Mr. Bhagwat A. Shinde for the Appellant. Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for State. Mr. B. K. Pawar for Respondent No.1. ... Shubham 2026:BHC-AUG:45852 903-FA-424-2011.doc CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 24 SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants. 2. By these Appeals, the Appellant assails the judgment and award dated 03.07.2008 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.718, 722, 721 and 720 of 1998. 3. Learned counsel submit that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Shubham