CRWP-3069-2026 IN THE HIGH COUR (137) POONAM AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE M Present: Mr. Vikas Saroha, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking iss official respondents No. the hands of family members of petitioner No.1 representation dated 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on P-5) before the Commissioner of Police, Gurugram mentioned in the present pet no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are i No.2-Commissioner of Police, Gurugram filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH POONAM AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Vikas Saroha, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at family members of petitioner No.1 representation dated 24.02.2026 (Annexure P-5). t the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Commissioner of Police, Gurugram mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are i Commissioner of Police, Gurugram to dec filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3069-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents RS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Vikas Saroha, Advocate for the petitioners The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the uance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at family members of petitioner No.1 and to take action on their ). t the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 24.02.2026 (Annexure Commissioner of Police, Gurugram raising their grievances as ition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Date of decision : 10.04.2026 The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the uance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at and to take action on their t the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted (Annexure raising their grievances as ition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the ssued to respondent ide the aforesaid representation AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3069-2026 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana the respondents-State and submits that the Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petitio of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 10.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) Notice of motion. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana has advance notice on behalf of State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petitio of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.02.2026 (Annexure P- period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No has advance notice on behalf of needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid -5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No has advance notice on behalf of needful will be done in due course. during the course of the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without n is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid ) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.