Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14707 (CHH)

LAXMI BHADRE @ LAXMI BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2735/2026 · 2026-03-23

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:13931 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2735 of 2026 1. Laxmi Bhadre @ Laxmi Baghel W/o Shri Chandrapraksha Bhadre Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Tarapura, Janpad Panchayat Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 2. Shriram Nag S/o Shri Chaituram Nag Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Kurandi, Janpad Panchayat Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 3. Mahanti Nag S/o Shri Shrinath Nag Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Manjhiguda, Janpad Panchayat Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 4. Ramsay Nag S/o Shri Budhru Nag Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Gumalwada, Janpad Panchayat Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 5. Durgesh Manjhi S/o Shri Sitaram Manjhi Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Manjhiguda, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 6. Phoolsingh Maurya S/o Shri Kanoo Mourya Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Tondapal, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 7. Ramdhar Patel S/o Late Baliram Patel Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Kawalikala, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 8. Pitambar Sethiya S/o Shri Surendranath Sethiya Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Kaikagarh, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 9. Sampat Nag S/o Shri Ishvar Nag Aged About 31 Years R/o Village- Sidmud, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 10.Lovekush Thakur S/o Shri Jayandra Thakur Aged About 31 Years R/o Village- Alnar, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 11. Ravindra Kumar Baghel S/o Shri Sitaram Manjhi Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Markel, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 12.Rajendra Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri Laikhan Kashyap Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Nagarnar, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 13.Dinesh Sethiya S/o Shri Satyawan Sethiya Aged About 31 Years R/o Village- Kaikagadh, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 14.Khemlata Netam D/o Late Ram Netam Aged About 27 Years R/o Village- Sargipal, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 3 15.Shankar Baghel S/o Late Ram Netam Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Chokawada, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 16.Sonsingh Baghel S/o Shri Jankiram Baghel Aged About 47 Years R/o Village- Nangur, Janpad Panchayat And Tahsil- Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 2. The Collector Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. 3. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, C.G. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondents- State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 24/03/2026 1. Grievance of petitioners is that the services of petitioners on the post of Rojgar Sahayak (Contract) is not renewed after April 2025. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are engaged as Rojgar Sahayak by virtue of appointment order dated 03.04.2025. Petitioners though continuously worked on the said post and place where they were appointed, but further renewal order has not been issued by respondent No. 3. He submits that petitioners have submitted representation before respondent No.3 on 13.03.2026, however, till date no decision has been taken on the same. 3. Learned State counsel submits that from pleadings and the documents enclosed it is apparent that grievance of petitioners is against respondent No.3 to whom he is not representing. 4. I have heard learned counsel for petitioners and perused the documents placed on record. 3 / 3 5. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing Respondents No. 2 and 3 to consider and take decision on the representation of petitioners, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of the order passed by this Court. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn