1 of 4 901-FA.3765.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3765 OF 2008 M I D C LATUR VERSUS MADHAVRAO GANUJI DHAGE AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Appellant Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. Adv. Sawari M. Patil h/f. Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for Respondent No.1. ... AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 1003 OF 2004 MAHA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VERSUS BABURAO NAGORAO JADHAV AND ORS … Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Appellant Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Amol Subhash Gandhi, Advocate for Respondent No.1a. AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 1166 OF 2006 DHONDIBA MAHAJAN JADHAV AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS … Mr. Pratap P. Mandlik a/w. Mr. Amol Gandhi and Mr. U. B. Bilolikar, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10877 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/28407/2026 RAHIBAI LAXMAN SHINDE DEAD THROUGH LRS SARSWATI AND ORS. VERSUS 2026:BHC-AUG:45051 2 of 4 901-FA.3765.2008 THE REGIONAL OFFICER, M.I.D.C. LATUR AND ORS. … Mr. Satish S. Manale, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10878 OF 2026 IN FA/2296/2010 RAHIBAI LAXMAN SHINDE DIED THR LRS SARSWATI AND ORS. VERSUS THE REGIONAL OFFICER, MAHARASHTRA, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LATUR AND ORS. … Mr. Satish S. Manale, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.1. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1339 OF 2019 IN X-OBJST/5538/2014 BABARAO NAGORAO JADHAV DIED THRO. L.RS. BALWANT BABARAO JADHAV VERSUS M.I.D.C. A CORPORATE BODY THROUGH DIVISI.OFFICER,LATUR … Mr. Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 1993, the appeals are heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 3 of 4 901-FA.3765.2008 2. By the present appeals, the Appellants are challenging the following judgments and awards:- (i) In First Appeal No.3765 of 2008, the judgment and award dated 27.02.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Biloli in LAR No.179/1998; (ii) In First Appeal No.1003 of 2004, the judgment and award dated 19.01.2004 passed by the learned 1st Adhoc Additional District Judge, Biloli in LAR No.77/2002 (Old No.166/1998); and (iii) In First Appeal No.1166 of 2006, the judgment and award dated 17.06.2006 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional District Judge, Biloli in LAR No.45/2002, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. 3. Learned Advocates for the respective Appellants submit that this Court has taken a view in First Appeal No.694 of 2004 decided on 29.06.2006 arising out of same acquisition proceeding i.e. for establishment of MIDC at village Krushnoor, Ghungarala and Savarkheda. 4. Upon perusal of order passed by this Court in First Appeal No.694 of 2004, I am inclined to adopt the same view in the present appeals. Therefore, present appeals along with civil applications are disposed of accordingly. Hence, the following order is passed:- 4 of 4 901-FA.3765.2008 ORDER (i) First Appeal No.1166 of 2006 filed by the Claimants as well as First Appeal Nos.3765 of 2008 and 1003 of 2004 filed by the acquiring body are dismissed. (ii) Pending civil applications along with cross objections, if any, are also disposed of. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef