Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14705 (CHH)

T. P. PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5658/2022 · 2026-02-05

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5658 of 2022 1 - T. P. Prajapati S/o Late Kashi Prasad Prajapati Aged About 74 Years R/o Station Road, Ward No. 8, Ajirma, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar 492002 Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar 492002 Chhattisgarh. 3 - Under Secretary Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar 492002 Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer Ramanujganj, Distt. Balrampur (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Distt. Balrampur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.V.R. Rajwade, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Topilal Bareth, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order On Board 06.02.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for the following relief(s); “10.1 To call for the entire record from Respondents Pertaining to the matter in hand. 10.2 To issue an appropriate Writ or direction to the Respondents to amend pay scale of Petitioner in light of order dated 27.11.2017 and release dues of the Petitioner with consequential benefit of revised HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Digitally signed by HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Date: 2026.02.11 17:03:02 +0530 2 scale of pay, revise his pension light of order dated 27.11.2017, alongwith interest till the date of actual payment. 10.3 Any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favor of the Petitioner, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of Justice. 10.4 Cost of the Petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as Lecturer (Geography) on 12.10.1973 and was subsequently promoted to the post of Principal on 30.08.1990. The petitioner retired from the post of Principal on 31.08.2010. It is further submitted that certain similarly situated employees had earlier filed representations before this Court which was registered as WPS No. 4421/2008, wherein a grievance was raised regarding reduction of their pay scale from Rs. 2375-4125 to Rs. 2000-3500. This Court vide order dated 08.03.2013 allowed the said writ petition and quashed the impugned order reducing the pay scale of the petitioners therein. Consequently, they were held entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 2375-4125 from the date of their promotion. 3. It is further submitted that the present petitioner also preferred WPS No. 1944/2015. This Court, while relying upon the judgment rendered in WPS No. 4421/2008, permitted the petitioner to submit a representation before the competent authority seeking similar relief on the ground of parity. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner submitted a representation, which was considered favourably and respondent No. 1, vide communication dated 27.11.2017 directed the District Education Officer, District Balrampur, and the Block Education Officer, District Balrampur to grant the pay scale of Rs. 2375-4125 to the petitioner from the date of his promotion and to re-fix his pay scale and pension accordingly. However, despite lapse of considerable time, the said 3 directions have not been complied with compelling the petitioner to file the present writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that certain documents were sought from the petitioner by the District Education Officer and upon submission of the requisite documents by the petitioner, his case would be duly considered by the competent authority. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. There is no dispute regarding the fact that the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Rs. 2375-4125 from the date of his promotion to the post of Principal, i.e., 30.08.1990. Similarly situated persons had earlier filed writ petitions which were allowed by this Court. In line with the said judgments, the petitioner’s representation was also allowed and directions were issued by the State Government to the concerned authorities for re-fixation of his pay scale and pension. It appears that despite the passage of several years, the said exercise has not been carried out by the respondents. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to comply with the communication dated 27.11.2017 filed as Annexure P/12, and to re-fix the pay scale and pension of the petitioner in terms of the said communication within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and to pay the arrears, if any, within the said period. 7. Consequently, the writ petition stands allowed. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge H.Ansari