5-FA-3520-2008.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3520 OF 2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3041 OF 2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3494 OF 2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10076 OF 2006 IN FA/3520/2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10079 OF 2006 IN FA/3041/2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10072 OF 2006 IN FA/3494/2008 Maharashtra Krishna Valley VERSUS The State Of Mah And Anr Shubham 2026:BHC-AUG:45720 5-FA-3520-2008.doc ... Mr. G. B. Rajale for the Appellant. Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for State. Ms. Khushi Varma h/f Mr. S. S. Shinde for Respondent No.2 in FA/3041/2008. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 24 SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. By this appeal, the appellant assails the judgment and award dated 18.06.1994 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.26/1992, 341/1993 and 266/1992. 3. Learned counsel submit that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 4. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Shubham