Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14696 (ALL)

M/S AKHAND ENTERPRISES PVT LTD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/39096/2026 · 2026-10-05

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39096 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on record. 2. Heard Sri Ashish Singh, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Akhand Pratap Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Authority and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. From the record, we find that the petitioners had taken certain property on lease on 4.7.2002 and thereafter had leased out a portion of that property by means of a tripartite lease deed on certain dates to the respondent nos. 5 and 6. 3. Grievance of the petitioners is that the clause H of the agreement entered into between the petitioners and the NOIDA Authorities on 4.7.2002 was being violated. 4. If that is the case, the petitioners can always approach the NOIDA Authorities and the NOIDA Authorities can take such remedial actions as are within their control. 5. No interference is warranted. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. October 6, 2026 PK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhand Pratap Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) M/S Akhand Enterprises Pvt Ltd And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad