APHC010012752017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 320/2017 Between: 1. A.V.NARAYANA, PRAKASAM DIST., S/O. CHINNA JANGAMAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC: SHIFT OPERATOR, R/O.SOMAVARIPETA VILLAGE, BESTEVARIPET MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K BHASKAR RAO PRAKASAM DIST 3 OTHERS, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION, APSPDCL, RAMNAGAR MAIN ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. KATTA VENKATESWARLU, DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, ONGOLE, APSPDCL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523001. 3. M HARI BABU, ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATION SUB DIVISION, RURAL-I, ONGOLE, APSPDCL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523002. 4. B MALLIKHARJUNA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, 33/11 KV SUB STATION, PALLAMALLI, CHIMAKURTHI SECTION, ONGOLE RURAL-I SUB-DIVISION, ONGOLE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience of order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.9053 of 2015, dated 01.04.2015 by His Lordship Hon'ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. V V N NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARI DEVI The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders dated 01.04.2015, passed in W.P. No.9053 of 2015. 2. When the matter is called, Sri Venkata Subaiah, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the main writ petition itself is closed on 13.04.2023 and in view of the same, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the contempt case. 3. Sri G. Saideep, learned counsel representing Sri V.V. Satish, learned counsel for the respondents, is present and has not disputed the said submission. 4. In such circumstances, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 09.03.2026 GVK 3 68 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.320 of 2017 Date: 09.03.2026 GVK