APHC010012032019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 548/2019 Between: 1. G TEREJAMMA, W/O PETHURU AGED 45 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. DANAM SUJATHA, W/O YEDUKONDALU AGED 40 YEARSRESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. DANAM SAVITHRI, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 63 RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. CHEEDARALA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O SUBBA RAO AGEED 45 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. AMUDALA DEEVENAMMA, W/O MARIYADASU AGED 63 YEARSRESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. CHEEDARALA KAMALA PRABHA, W/O VENKATESWARA RAG AGED 63 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. BATTU SURESH, S/O ISRAIL AGED 38 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. KHANDAVALLI VIJAYA, W/O SANTHAKUMAR AGED 45 YEARS 2 RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. BATTU YESTHERU RANI, W/O ISRAIL AGED 53 YEARS 10. MULPURI ANASURYA, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED 63 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. BOPPANA MUTHAMMA, W/O JAGANMOHANA RAO AGED 43 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. CHEEDARA NAGA LAKSHMI, W/O PRASAD AGED 35 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 13. CHEEDARALA ANNAPURNA, W/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 45 YEARS RESIDENTS OF AYYAPARAJUGUDEM VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU DIVISION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, LINGAPALEM MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly 4th respondent in insisting the petitioners to vacate from their respective house site plots admeasuring Ac. 0.02 cents each consisting of different plot numbers, covered by Survey No. 51/3C and 52/2, situated in Ayyapparaju Gudem Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District, 3 assigned in their favour by Proceedings dt. 03.04.2013 issued by 4th respondent, as illegal, irregular. irrational, without jurisdiction, violative of Standing Orders 15 and 21 of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners' possession over their said house site properties IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners' possession over their house site properties admeasuring Ac. 0.02 cents each consisting of different plot numbers. covered by Survey No. 51/3C and 52/2, situated in Ayyapparaju Gudem Revenue Village in Lingapalem Mandal of West Godavari District, assigned in their favour by Proceedings dt. 03.04.2013 issued by 4th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOLLURI ARJUN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Sk. Jahangeer Basha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.03.2026 KAS 5 209 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 548/2019 Dated: 02.03.2026 KAS