Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14690 (JHR)

DR NIRMALA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THR THE SECRETARY HIGHER TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

WPC/2889/2026 · 2026-05-12

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15426 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2899 of 2026 …… Raju Saw, aged about 40 years, son of Late Nand Kishore Saw, resident of Chanakyapuri, Kame, Ratu, P.O. Kamre, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.…. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2.Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University through its Registrar, having its office at Morabadi, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Bariatu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv For the Resp.-State : Mr. Anish Kr. Mishra, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I Mr. Arpan Mishra, Adv. …… 2/12.05.2026 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/direction(s) commanding upon the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioner on the post of Lower Divisional Clerk since 17.04.2015, on passing the departmental examination and pursuant to report of the Two Members Committee dated 22.07.2019 and 21.01.2020 respectively, along with all consequential benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; as such, he submits that this case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the 2026:JHHC:15426 2 petitioner to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent for redressal of his grievance. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may approach the concerned respondent for redressal of his grievance. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and looking to the prayer made in the instant writ application, the same is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation along with all relevant documents. 6. The moment concerned respondent receives the representation; he shall take a decision in the matter with regard to the claim raised in the writ application after verification of the record in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J) 12.05.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 27.05.2026