Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14690 (ALL)

M/S SAI TRADERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/32130/2026 · 2026-10-05

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32130 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri Subham Tripathi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashok Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.C.Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent. It is contended by learned counsel for the respondent that because of non availability of the fund, payment could not be made, however, payment against work done by the petitioner is admitted by the Nagar Palika Parishad and there is no dispute of the work done by the petitioner. He further submits that within four months outstanding dues of Rs. 74, 53,464/- shall be paid in two equal installments . In view of statement so made by learned counsel for the respondent, petition stands disposed of with direction to the authority concerned Nagar Palika Parishad, Maharajganj, that payment shall be made in two equal installments. However, in the event payment is not made or any balance remains unpaid, the petitioner would be entitled for interest @ 8 percent from the date payment had become due till actual payment is made. October 6, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Chandra Dwivedi (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) M/S Sai Traders .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad