Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14688 (ALL)

KALLU @ NAHAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/24168/2026 · 2026-10-08

Avnish Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24168 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 1A. Learned counsel for the applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, the same is taken on record. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Kallu @ Nahar Singh to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 203 of 2009, under Sections 307, 394, 411 IPC, P.S.- Usharahar, District- Etawah, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the FIR in the year 2009 pertaining to robbery wherein the name of accused/applicant is figured out subsequently during investigation he was enlarged on bail in order dated 11.05.2020 but could not appear before the trial court during trial for some time, which led to the issuance of processes. The applicant then surrendered himself on 29.04.2026 and since then he is in jail. The accused/applicant has criminal history of six cases, in one case final report is submitted, in one case he has not been charge sheeted and in four cases, he is on bail. The trial is still continuing. He seeks to be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Sharma, Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kallu @ Nahar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the matter pertains to jumping of bail, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 9, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 24168 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad