1 2026:CGHC:2918-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 184 of 2026 1 - Keshav Sahu S/o Uttara Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir- Champa C.G. 2 - Surendra Sahu S/o Uttara Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir- Champa C.G. 3 - Amarika Sahu W/o Uttara Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir- Champa C.G. 4 - Narendra Sahu S/o Bhupendra Sahu Aged About 18 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir-Champa C.G. 5 - Savita Sahu D/o Bhupendra Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir- Champa C.G. 6 - Uttara Sahu S/o Late Ishwar Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Bandhawapara Bilari, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District - Janjgir- Champa C.G. 7 - Kirtan Sahu S/o Late Ishwar Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Koida, Police Station- Kasdol, District- Baloudabazar Bhatapara C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur C.G. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.01.20 11:29:36 +0530 2 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Janjgir-Champa, District - Janjgir Champa C.G. 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station- Anusuchit Jati Kalyan Janjgir- Champa, District - Janjgir Champa C.G. 4 - Ramkumar Rohidas S/o Late Chheduram Rohidas R/o Village- Mehandi, Police Station- Shivrinarayan, District- Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyamta Prasad Sannat, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Shyamta Prasad Sannat, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No.1 to 3 / State. 2. The petitioners have filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and further be pleased to quash the first information report bearing Crime No. 15/2025 dated 06-12-2025, registered at Police Station Anusuchit Jati Kalyan Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 3(2)(Va), SC/ST (prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (Amendment 2015) U/s 191(2), 296, 351(2) The IPC of Bharatiya 3 Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 against the applicants, in the interest of justice.” 3. From perusal of the present petition, it transpires that the same has been reported to be suffering from defects / defaults as pointed out by the Registry of this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to adjourn the present petition in order to remove the defects / defaults. However, it transpires that the present petitioner was filed on 19.12.2025 and thereafter notice was sent to the Office of Advocate General on the same day. But, the learned counsel for the petitioners did not care to remove the defaults for nearly about a month and today, when the matter has been called out for hearing, counsel for the petitioners prays to adjourn the matter. 5. We do not find any good ground to adjourn the matter in order to provide time to learned counsel for the petitioners to remove the defects. Accordingly, his prayer for adjournment is rejected. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost by the counsel for the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Specialized Adoption Agency Bemetara (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court. 4 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet