Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14683 (AP)

CHITTAMURU PRAMEELA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/970/2026 · 2026-01-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010014932026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 970/2026 Between: 1. CHITTAMURU PRAMEELA, W/O. CHITTAMURU SRINIVASULU REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. BUDANAM VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 2. SRI CHITTAMURU SRINIVASULU REDDY,, S/O. CH. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC RUNNING TIFFIN STALL, R/O. BUDANAM VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 3. SRI JALADANKI NARESH REDDY,, S/O. GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. ALLAMPADU VILLAGE KOTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 4. SRI CHITTAMURU JAGADEESH,, S/O. CHITTAMURU SRINIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE DRIVER, R/O. BUDANAM VILLAGE, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILLAKUR POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). 6. SMT MAIN JYOTHI, W/O. DEVELLA AMERENDRA, D/O. MALLI KRISHNAIAH, KONDAPURAM VILLAGE, VAKADU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). PRESENTLY R/O. VARAGALI CROSS ROAD, KRISHNAPURAM 2 COLONY, CHILLAKUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. (ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 5 herein in interfering, pressurizing the petitioners herein by calling the petitioners to the 5th respondent police station and 3rd respondent office without any case registered as against these petitioners and asking the 4th petitioner to marry the 6th respondent herein who is a married lady or else threatening the petitioners to be implicated in false and fictitious cases, inspite of the report given by the 1st petitioner herein dated 27-12-2025 and inspite of the Injunction suit vide O.S.No. 343 of 2025 pending on the file of the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge Court, Gudur as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the established principles of law and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 herein to not to interfere, threaten and pressurize the 4th petitioner herein to marry the 6th respondent.” 2. Ms.K.Pallavi, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Police are calling the Petitioners to the Police Station, without there being any crime registered against them and are pressurizing Petitioner No.4 to marry Respondent No.6. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, no complaint has been received by the Police from either of the parties. It is further submitted that, no crime has been registered against the Petitioners. The Police tried to pacify the issue between the parties. 3 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Respondent – Authorities are directed to act according to law and not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station, in the absence of any crime registered against them. Respondent – Authorities are further directed to follow due process of law to secure the presence of the Petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:08.01.2026 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.970 of 2026 Dt.08.01.2026 Dinesh