Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14682 (JHR)

MANIR KHAN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10561/2025 · 2026-02-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4482 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10561 of 2025 ----- Manir Khan, son of late Samir Khan, R/o village Langra More, PO and PS Chainpur, District Gumla, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. S. Nanda, Advocate Mr. N. K. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. PP …...... 03 /17.02.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 27(b)(ii) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Sections 21/22(c) of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. 13 boxes of ONEREX Cough Syrup were recovered but not from the house of the petitioner rather it was recovered behind the house of the petitioner from some bushes. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail 5. Considering the place of recovery, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like 2026:JHHC:4482 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in connection with Chainpur PS Case No. 39 of 2025 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner, having sufficient landed property in his own name within the State of Jharkhand. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 18.02.2026