Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14678 (KAR)

SMT MUNIYAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18741/2025 · 2026-03-05

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13434 WP No. 18741 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 18741 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 2. SMT.NANJAMMA W/O THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS, 3. SMT. PADMA W/O LATE LAKSHMANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A GULAKAMALE VILLAGE, UTTARAHOBLI, BENGALURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 4. SMT.KAMALAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 5. SMT GIRIJAMMA ALIAS GOWRAMMA W/O NARAYANACHARI ALIAS NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 6. SMT.SAROJAMMA ALIAS TULASIBAI W/O LATE GOPAL ALIAS KUPPE NAYAK, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13434 WP No. 18741 of 2025 7. SMT INDUBAIALIS PADMAVATHI W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA SHINDE ALIAS SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 8. SRI HEERALALA ALIAS MUTHURAYAPPA S/O LATE PREMJI ALIAS PERUMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, KAMALAMMA ALL R/A GULAKAMALE VILLAGE, UTTARAHOBLI, BENGALURU HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER ALL REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SRI. RAJASHEKARA SHARMA G.R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA AND KAMALAMMA (PETITIONER NO. 4) AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO. 468, 8TH CROSS, SRI. NAGACHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE, LAKSHMI LAYOUT, PUTTENAHALLI, JP NAGARA,7TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESH MAHALE SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SRINIDHI S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13434 WP No. 18741 of 2025 KG ROAD, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KG ROAD, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 001. 4. THE TASHILDHAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU, KG ROAD, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 001. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR LAND RECORDS BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 5600 6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY SETTLEMENT BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-5600 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS. DECLARE THAT THE GRANT MADE IN FAVOR OF PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-F TO P HAS ATTAINED FINALITY AND IS IN FULL FORCE. DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 4 TO MUTATE RTCS IN NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE LANDS AND ALSO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 6 TO CONDUCT PHODI AND DURASTI ON - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13434 WP No. 18741 of 2025 PETITIONERS PROPERTY (MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREIN UNDER) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners has pointed out to Annexure-AG, an order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2867/2025 at the instance of the petitioners herein. 3. This Court, by order dated 18.02.2025, in the aforesaid writ petition directed respondent No.4-Tahsildar to consider the representations given by the petitioners and accomplish the directions given within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 4. Therefore, if there is non-compliance at the hands of respondent No.4-Tahsildar, petitioners will have to approach - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13434 WP No. 18741 of 2025 the contempt Court. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Liberty is accordingly reserved to petitioners to approach the contempt Court if respondent No.4 has not complied with the directions already issued by this Court. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31