Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14674 (HP)

SHARWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP

CWP/11211/2026 · 2026-07-08

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:27466 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11211 of 2026 Decided on: 08.07.2026 Shrawan Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the transfer order dated 30.06.2026 (Annexure P-1), in terms whereof, the petitioner, who is serving as a Lecturer in GSSS Dhulara, District Chamba, to GSSS Chah-Ka-Dohra, District Mandi. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has completed his normal tenure at the present station but in light of the fact that he is to superannuate in less than two years, interest of justice would be served, in case, respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner and if possible, to adjust him at a nearby station. 4. This Court is of the considered view that interest of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:27466 justice would be served, in case, petitioner approaches the Authority by way of a representation and the Authority takes a call on the said representation in light of the guidelines of the Transfer Policy. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner approaching the Authority, by way of a representation for his adjustment within one week from today, appropriate orders be passed thereupon, as expeditiously as possible and definitely, in light of the transfer policy within a period of four weeks as from the date of receipt of the representation. Till decision on the representation, the petitioner will be allowed to serve at GSSS Dhulara, District Chamba de hors he stands relieved or not. This order is being passed by this Court as in terms of Annexure P-1, single transfer has been effected and none has been posted in place of the petitioner at GSSS Dhulara. 6. It goes without saying that in case the petitioner does not file appropriate representation within one week from today, then this order will lose its efficacy. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 08, 2026 (narender)