Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14670 (ALL)

DEEPAK MALVIYA v. SMARTH DHARMAVALAMBINI SABHA 6, RAM BAGH, HANUMAN MANDIR PRAYAGRAJ

A227/14299/2026 · 2026-10-08

Y K Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14299 of 2026 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail the order dated 14.08.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.16, Prayagraj in SCC Suit No. 04 of 2023, whereby application filed seeking impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC has been rejected. Sri Niraj Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after making submissions to some extent has not disputed that the order impugned would be subject to a further statutory legal remedy and in view thereof the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy. Sri Ajeet Dixit, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that he has no objection. The petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed. Office to return certified copy(ies) of the order(s) to counsel for the petitioner after retaining photostat copy(ies) thereof. October 9, 2026 Imroz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niraj Tiwari, Saurabh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajeet Dixit (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Deepak Malviya .....Petitioner(s) Smarth Dharmavalambini Sabha 6, Ram Bagh, Hanuman Mandir Prayagraj .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad