Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14668 (ALL)

SANU PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12044/2026 · 2026-10-05

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12044 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. At the outset, learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel appearing for the Varanasi Development Authority, Shri Ravi Prakash Pandey, submit that the instant writ petition is not maintainable, being second writ petition filed by the petitioner in respect of the same cause of action. It is further submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed Writ-C No. 49940 of 2014, which was dismissed in default vide order dated 21.03.2023. Against the said order, the petitioner has filed a restoration application, which has been recalled by the order passed today i.e. on 06.10.2026 in Restoration Application No.8 of 2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact and as such he prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. October 6, 2026 Mukesh Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Sharma, Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Pandey (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sanu Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad