THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -3 v. FOCUS INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD.
ITA/515/2026 · 2026-08-18
Dinesh Mehta, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14667 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14667 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~3&4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010290442026 + ITA 515/2026 & CM APPL. 42477/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010296282026 + ITA 524/2026 & CM APPL. 43265/2026 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -3 .....Appellant Through: Mr.Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr.Shivendra Singh and Mr.Yojit Pareek, JSCs. versus FOCUS INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD. .....Respondent Through: None CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R %
18.08.2026
1. The present appeal is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ‘F’, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) dated 11.06.2025, whereby the Tribunal has rejected the appeal filed by the Department, as the substantial additions made in the hands of Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jindal were, in a way, upheld by the Tribunal, and such assessee’s appeal was partly allowed.
2. Indisputably, the addition in the hands of respondent-assessee were made on a protective basis and substantive additions were made in the hands of Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jindal and such additions, on principles, have been affirmed, subject of course to some reduction in the quantum. There is no This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:12:19
dispute so far as burden of liability or assessibility of the subject income is concerned.
3. We are, therefore, of the view that since the Tribunal being the final fact finding authority, has found the additions to be attributable to the assessee namely, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jindal, the Department’s instant appeal, in which additions protectively made in the hands of the respondent is under question, cannot survive or sustain.
4. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed along with the pending applications.
DINESH MEHTA, J.
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 18, 2026 neelam This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:12:19